Determining child custody is one of the hardest aspects of a divorce. Even the most amicable of divorces can become tense and complicated when a couple begins to discuss child custody arrangements. One of the most important things for Ohio couples to remember is that there are ways to pursue what is best for all parties.
Divorce can be hard. It is often hardest on children, and Ohio parents know that they may have to seek creative solutions to solve custody or visitation issues. Parenting after a divorce can be complicated because all parties have been emotionally and mentally impacted by the process. This complication can be compounded when one parent moves or remarries, or if a child has specific or special needs.
For those Ohio parents who also serve within the United States armed forces, the challenges of balancing service to one’s country with the responsibilities of raising a family are significant. Military families have to create an intricate system of scheduling, parenting time and help from their support network in order to do a great job on both fronts. However, there is an even more pressing concern for those military parents who are going through a child custody case. In some instances, it can appear as if one’s military service is used as a weapon against them in their fight to assert their parental rights.
For parents in states that allow the use of medical marijuana, concerns over how such use might impact their family status should be a top concern. While medical marijuana is not yet a reality for Ohio residents, there is much to be learned by the child custody struggles facing parents in states that have passed medical marijuana legislation. Understanding the issues that these parents are facing could help others avoid similar child custody struggles centered on the legal use of marijuana.
For those in Ohio who share children, the end of a marriage is far more complicated than it is for most childless couples. Balancing the best interests of the child or children against the needs of the parents can be a challenge. However, it is also important to understand that placing the needs of ones children in a primary position is a practice that should be employed at all times, even after the divorce has been made final. Failing to do so can lead to negative outcomes for the children caught in the middle of a divorce and child custody battle.
Many in Ohio would recognize the face of talk show host Sherri Shepherd. The co-host of the popular television show “The View” is in the beginning stages of what may turn out to be a bitter and lengthy child custody battle with her soon-to-be-ex husband, Lamar Sally. The case is unusual in that they pair are fighting over the care and custody of a child that has yet to be born.
A recent study reveals a troubling trend among Ohio families. The state’s human services agency has reviewed data from recent years, and found that the number of cases in which heroin played a role within child custody cases rose 83 percent from the rate just three years ago. It is now estimated that heroin was a factor in as many as 7,000 cases just last year alone.
Many Ohio residents encounter difficulty when trying to conceive a child. For a number of reasons, some will choose to add to their family by means of artificial insemination. This can be a positive experience for all involved, but it is imperative to take the proper legal precautions to protect one’s legal rights. Failure to do so can lead to difficult child custody struggles in the years to come.
Many Ohio readers will remember the work of actor Jason Patric. The Lost Boys star has been making recent headlines for matters unrelated to his career path as he continues to fight for access to his young son. Patric has become an advocate of fathers' rights, and is speaking out about his own child custody struggles in the hopes of helping others in similar circumstances to retain access to their children.
Many of those in Ohio who follow international child custody law are saddened by a recent ruling by the United States Supreme Court. The decision may make it more difficult for parents living abroad whose partners flee with their child to seek their immediate return for child custody litigation. The case clarifies the stance of the United States toward the provisions of the Hague Convention of the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.